**Published name**
1. On a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being ‘strongly disagree’ and 5 being ‘strongly agree’, how strongly do you believe that the draft National Other Effective area-based Conservation Measures Framework will contribute to high quality Conserved Area additions to the Conserved Area Network?
2. On a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being ‘unclear’ and 5 being ‘clear’, how clear is the draft National Other Effective area-based Conservation Measures Framework, including figures and diagrams?
3. Are there any gaps in the draft National Other Effective area-based Conservation Measures Framework?
5. Is the proposed site assessment tool for Conserved Areas recognition fit for purpose to identify sites eligible for Conserved Area recognition?
5.1 Can you please expand on your response to the previous question.
Time constraints meant that ALCA has responded to the top-level strategic issues in the Framework, but reserve our position on the site assessment tool. We would still like the opportunity to provide feedback if we can.
6. If you have tested the proposed site assessment tool on a specific site, on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being ‘strongly disagree’ and 5 being ‘strongly agree’, how strongly do you think it was easy to use?
6.1 On a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being ‘strongly disagree’ and 5 being ‘strongly agree’, how strongly do you think the proposed site assessment tool is fit for purpose?
6.2 Can you expand on your responses to Q6 and Q6.1.
What aspects of the tool were good, and what improvements could be made?
Have not assessed site assessment tool yet.
Upload a submission
