Return to published responses
#29
Catherine

Published name

Catherine

1. What is your experience of Cockatoo Island / Wareamah?

Visited within last year

2. Which of the following best describes your overall response to the Cockatoo Island / Wareamah Draft Master Plan?

Very unsupportive

3. How important to you is each of the following Cockatoo Island / Wareamah Draft Master Plan objectives?

Response breakdown
20%
Very important
40%
Neutral
20%
Not important
20%
Not at all important
Conserve, protect and interpret the World Heritage Values
Very important
Establish Cockatoo Island / Wareamah as a place for tourism, restaurants and cafes, accommodation, events, creativity and employment
Not at all important
Enhance the access and connection to the island for Greater Sydney
Neutral
Rehabilitate the island’s waters and built assets for the use and benefit of future generations
Neutral
Establish, conserve and protect First Nations values of place
Not important

4. The Cockatoo Island / Wareamah Draft Master Plan brings together many considerations to create an engaging experience. How satisfied are you that the draft master plan addresses each of the following historical themes?

Response breakdown
50%
Very satisfied
50%
Neutral
Connecting with Country
Neutral
Natural history
Very satisfied
Convicts, prisoners and school children
Neutral
Dock working, ship building and defending Australia
Very satisfied

Would you like to submit any specific feedback on the proposals within Cockatoo Island / Wareamah Draft Master Plan?

We need to have more of a focus on the ship building and convict history of the island. We don't need parks, flashy accommodation or flashy restaurants. It is nice just to visit and eat from the kiosk.

Would you like to upload a document or documents?

No